Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fiori, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sands, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Blending Cottons Differing Widely in Maturity

Part I: Effect on Properties of Single Yarns

Louis A. Fiori

Southern Regional Restarch Laboratory, New Orleans, Louisiana

Gain L. Louis

Southern Regional Restarch Laboratory, New Orleans, Louisiana

Jack E. Sands

Southern Regional Restarch Laboratory, New Orleans, Louisiana

The blending of extremely fine and coarse cottons was investigated as a possible way of economically using these difficult-to-market cottons in the blended form. Two cottons differing appreciably in fiber fineness (approximately 3.0 and 6.0 µg./in.) but having other pertinent fiber properties about equal were blended together to produce a mixture averaging about 4.0 µg./in. in fineness. For comparative purposes a control cotton also averaging about 4.0 µg./in. in fineness was used. The blended and control cottons were spun into coarse and medium yarns of varying twists and into yarn num bers suitable for weaving Type 128 sheeting (64 X 64). The spinning efficiency of the two cottons was evaluated, on a pilot plant basis, in terms of ends down per thousand spindle hours.

Waste, nep count, yarn properties (skein and single strand strength, break elonga tion, uniformity, and grade), and end breakage rate in spinning were similar for the blended and control cottons. Microscopical examination of yarn cross sections did not reveal any migratory tendencies of either the fine or coarse fibers. For the same yarn number the blended and control cottons produced yarns of similar diameters and softness values.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 29, No. 9, 706-716 (1959)
DOI: 10.1177/004051755902900906


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
W. T. Waters and J. Phillips
The Effect of Blending Cottons of Dissimilar Fiber Properties upon Spinning Performance and Yarn Quality
Textile Research Journal, July 1, 1961; 31(7): 608 - 618.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
K.P.R. Pillay and K.S. Shankaranarayana
Variation in the Properties of Cotton Fibers with Length
Textile Research Journal, June 1, 1961; 31(6): 515 - 524.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
L. A. Fiori, G. L. Louis, and J. E. Sands
Blending Cottons Differing Widely in Maturity: Part II: Effect on the Physical Properties of a Sheeting Fabric (Type 128)
Textile Research Journal, December 1, 1960; 30(12): 926 - 933.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
R.A. Rusca
Recent Improvements in Textile Processing Machinery and Methods
Textile Research Journal, September 1, 1960; 30(9): 685 - 691.
[PDF]


Home page
Textile Research JournalHome page
S.C. Mayne Jr, W. T. Mathews Jr, and E. E. Berkley
Effects of Blending Cottons by Fineness on Cotton Costs, Processing Efficiency, and Yarn Quality
Textile Research Journal, April 1, 1960; 30(4): 268 - 276.
[PDF]