Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chance, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Drake, G. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Methylol Derivatives of Halo Cyanoacetamides and Their Evaluation on Cotton Fabrics1

Leon H. Chance

Southern Regional Research Laboratory2 New Orleans, Louisiana

Ethel K. Leonard

Southern Regional Research Laboratory2 New Orleans, Louisiana

George L. Drake, Jr

Southern Regional Research Laboratory2 New Orleans, Louisiana

Methylol derivatives of dibromocyanoacetamide (DBCA) and dichlorocyanoacetamide (DCCA) were prepared and applied to cotton fabric by conventional techniques for methylolamide finishes. Fabric cross-linked with these two compounds had improved wrinkle recovery and flame resistance, accompanied by rather large strength losses. Since the best wrinkle recovery and flame resistance were obtained with DBCA, it was studied in more detail. The finish was fairly resistant to removal by base hydrolysis, but was more resistant to acid hydrolysis. This was attributed to the strongly electron- withdrawing cyano group and bromine atoms. The finish also imparted considerable rot resistance to cotton fabric. Both finishes were sensitive to relatively low tempera tures. Differential thermal analysis confirmed the low decomposition point of the treated fabric, which is probably a contributing factor to the flame resistance.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 37, No. 5, 339-343 (1967)
DOI: 10.1177/004051756703700501


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?