Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ramey, H.H.
Right arrow Articles by French, A.D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Boll Age and Mercerization on Cotton Fiber Properties

H.H. Ramey, JR

USDA, SEA, Cotton Quality Laboratories, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, U.S.A.

R. Lawson

USDA, SEA, Cotton Quality Laboratories, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, U.S.A.

K.E. Duckett

Institute of Agriculture, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37916, U.S.A.

A.D. French

USDA, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70179, U.S.A.

Samples of six cotton cultivars grown in three environments in 1977 and 1978 were harvested 26 days postanthesis and at 6-day intervals thereafter until boll opening to obtain samples of four boll ages. Fiber fineness and maturity data were compared with mechanical properties from samples that were untreated, mercerized slack, and mercerized under tension. Micronaire reading, wall thickness, linear density, and cross-sectional area increased with boll age. In untreated samples there was no consistent pattern of change in tenacity with boll age, but for all three treatments load-to-break for individual fibers increased with boll age. The 26-day-old fibers had thinner walls, higher x-ray angles, and a lower degree of crystallinity than the older fibers.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 52, No. 4, 250-255 (1982)
DOI: 10.1177/004051758205200404


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?