Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bateup, B.O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Modified Rinsing Conditions on the Whiteness of Laboratory Scoured Wool

B.O. Bateup

CSIRO Division of Textile Industry, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia

The effect of detergent distribution and the influence of various additives to the penultimate rinse bowl on the whiteness of laboratory scouted wool was investigated. With different distributions of scouring reagents (nonionic detergent plus alkali) between bowls 1 to 3 and a rinse in bowl 4, the whitest samples of both high yielding and low yielding merino fleece wools were obtained with the following bowl compositions: bowl 1, a large amount of detergent plus alkali; bowl 2, rinse; bowl 3, a small amount of detergent plus alkali; bowl 4, rinse. The lowest whiteness resulted when all the detergent was added to the first bowl. Intermediate whitenesses were obtained when a small amount of detergent plus alkali was followed by a large amount in the later bowls.

In a more conventional scouring system with constant scouring conditions in bowls 1 and 2, the addition of various builders to bowl 3 increased the whiteness in the order sodium carbonate < trisodium citrate < trisodium ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA-3) < trisodium nitrilotriacetate. Analyses of the level of residual contaminantes gave a statistically significant negative linear correlation between whiteness and residual iron content for both high and low yielding wool. For the low yielding wool, statistically significant correlations aiso existed between whiteness and residual solvent extractables, residual calcium, and ash content.

The improved whiteness obtained using EDTA-3 compared with no additive was also observed initially in simulated continuous scouring, but the overall whiteness decreased rapidly thereafter because of the rapid build-up of contaminants in the liquor.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 55, No. 1, 50-57 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/004051758505500110


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?