Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, V.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A Kinetic Model for Pilling of Wool Knitwear

V.A. Williams

CSIRO Division of Textile Industry, Belmont, Victoria 3216, Australia

The simplified Conti and Tassinari model describing the kinetic mechanism of pilling was adopted for knitted wool fabrics, and the theory extended to compare the relative masses of pill able and nonpillable fiber being removed during the attrition process. Wool treated with potassium permanganate in saturated sodium sulphate forms fewer and smaller pills than untreated. Kinetic parameters were derived for random tumble and ICI pill box pilling, and pill build-up and decay rates were established. Application of the extended model shows that pillable fuzz is less than 4% of the total wool fiber removed in random tumble tests, and treatment with 5% permanganate decreases pilling by 90%. ICI pill box pilling is slow, and pill removal was incomplete after 140 hours. Similar proportions of fiber were involved in pill formation, but the extent of pilling and fuzz removal was greater than for random tumble pilling.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 55, No. 5, 312-320 (1985)
DOI: 10.1177/004051758505500509


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?