Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Langley, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Coskuntuna, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Distinguishing Between New and Recycled Cashmere with Fisher's Discriminant Analysis

Kenneth D. Langley

University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747, U.S.A.

Esra Coskuntuna

University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747, U.S.A.

The mechanical actions involved in recycling cashmere fibers, notably from woven fabrics, cause fiber damage. There are three distinct forms of damage: partial cleavages, axial fractures, and short fibers. Fisher's discriminant analysis techniques are applied to two groups of cashmere fibers, new and recycled. The discriminant function is tested on additional samples from the two groups, all of which are correctly allocated. Thus, the model is apparently capable of distinguishing between new and recycled cashmere fibers.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 70, No. 2, 181-184 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/004051750007000216
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?