Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Textile Research Journal
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dupont, D.
Right arrow Articles by Lejarre, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Measuring Fiber Fineness with the Sheffield Apparatus

Daniel Dupont

Laboratoire de Genie et Matériaux Textiles-ENSAIT, Ecole Supérieure des Techniques Industrielles et des Textiles, BP 209, F59654 Villeneuve d'Ascq, France

Pierre Lejarre

Equipe de Recherche en Automatique des Systèmes et Microsystèmes Département Instrumentation et Méthodologies F59046 Lille Cédex, France

The Sheffield apparatus measures the fineness of cotton fibers in a sample. It gives a direct readout of the micronaire reading, that is to say, the average number of micrograms per inch of the fibers. The principle is based on a permeability-to-air method. The drawback with this apparatus is that the measurement is made on a sample with a mass defined to the nearest milligram (3.240 ± 0.001 g), which requires a relatively long measuring time. This paper attempts to show that it is possible to overcome this constraint by using a sample with a mass of between 2.5 and 3.5 g, thus reducing the measuring time by approximately 50%.

Textile Research Journal, Vol. 72, No. 3, 227-231 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/004051750207200308


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?