This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rebenfeld, L. Articles by Virgin, W.P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Relation between the X-Ray Angle of Cottons and Their Fiber Mechanical Properties

Textile Research Institute, Princeton, N.J.

W.P. Virgin

Textile Research Institute, Princeton, N.J.

Correlations are presented between the spiral angle, as measured by the X-ray angle (40% absorption angle of 002 diffraction are), and the mechanical properties of 16 cot tons. A significant correlation is found for Pressley strength at zero gauge length : however, virtually no correlations exist when cotton strength is measured at 5.0-mm. gauge length. Highly significant correlations are found between the spiral angle and the extensibility properties of cotton fibers, as measured by single fiber elastic modulus and elongation to break.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. C. Weiss, R. S. Orr, J. J. Redmann, and J. N. Grant Moduli of Cotton Fibers and Yarns in Relation to X-Ray Angles Textile Research Journal, September 1, 1961; 31(9): 787 - 793. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. S. Orr, A. W. Burgis, L. B. DeLuca, and J. N. Grant The Role of Spiral Structure in Untreated and Treated Cottons Textile Research Journal, April 1, 1961; 31(4): 302 - 310. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Rebenfeld Response of Cottons to Chemical Treatments: Part III: Yarn Resin Finishing Textile Research Journal, April 1, 1961; 31(4): 311 - 316. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Rebenfeld Response of Cottons to Chemical Treatments: Part II: Yarn Mercerization Textile Research Journal, March 1, 1961; 31(3): 253 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Rebenfeld Response of Cottons to Chemical Treatments Part I: Fiber Mercerization and Urea Treatments 1 Textile Research Journal, February 1, 1961; 31(2): 123 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B.R. Shelat, T. Radhakrishnan, and B.V. Iyer The Relation between Crystallite Orientation and Mechanical Properties of Mercerized Cottons Textile Research Journal, November 1, 1960; 30(11): 836 - 842. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. P. McNally and F. A. McCord Cotton Quality Study: V: Resistance to Abrasion Textile Research Journal, October 1, 1960; 30(10): 715 - 751. [PDF]

				On Tensile Properties of Alkali-Treated Jute Fibers: Institute for Fibres and Forest Products Research Jerusalem, Israel May 31, 1960 Textile Research Journal, October 1, 1960; 30(10): 798 - 800. [PDF]

				T. Radhakrlshnan, B.V. Iyer, G.S. Viswanathan, and H. Wakeham The Relation Between Crystallite Orientation and Tensile Properties of Mercerized Cotton Textile Research Journal, April 1, 1959; 29(4): 322 - 331. [PDF]

				R. S. Orr, L. B. DeLuca, A. W. Burgis, and J. N. Grant Fiber Structure and Mechanical Properties of Untreated and Modified Cottons Textile Research Journal, February 1, 1959; 29(2): 144 - 150. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Rebenfeld Transmission of Cotton Fiber Strength and Extensibility1.2 Textile Research Journal, July 1, 1958; 28(7): 585 - 592. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Rebenfeld Mechanical Properties of Cotton Fibers and Their Response to Mercerization1 Textile Research Journal, June 1, 1958; 28(6): 462 - 466. [Abstract] [PDF]

				V. W. Tripp, R. S. Orr, H. M. Ziifle, and C. M. Conrad Some Relationships Between Supermolecular Structure and Mechanical Behavior of Native and Chemically Modified Cotton Cellulose1 Textile Research Journal, May 1, 1958; 28(5): 404 - 417. [Abstract] [PDF]